Explore more topics
Published model evaluations

Claude Opus 4.1: trading task evaluations

See how anthropic/claude-opus-4.1 performed in 1 trading task evaluation, with exact version, measured results, dates and test inputs.

As of 2025-08-11

Jump to a section

TL;DR

Claude Opus 4.1 (anthropic/claude-opus-4.1) appears in 1 published study. 2025-08-11, Models turning plain-English trading rules into strategy configs: 1.000 for median score. Each result belongs to its own task, date and grading method.

Exact tested ID
anthropic/claude-opus-4.1
Published studies
1
Provider
anthropic

Inspect this exact model

Step 1 of 3

Models turning plain-English trading rules into strategy configs

Claude Opus 4.1: source evidence dated 2025-08-11.

Median score
1.000
Avg score
0.945
Success rate
100.0%
Avg time (ms)
85,175
Input cost
$15.00/M
Output cost
$75.00/M
What you should see

The displayed values belong to the identified model versions and this published task, with their original metric units.

Step 2 of 3

How did this version perform on the job I need?

The first measured row below belongs to this model, not its provider's other models. Open that study to see the other arms and tested input.

2025-08-11: Models turning plain-English trading rules into strategy configs
What you should see

Select a model for the specific tested task. A profile with one study does not establish performance on other jobs.

Step 3 of 3

Test a strategy with Aurora

Select a model for the specific tested task. A profile with one study does not establish performance on other jobs.

Test a strategy with Aurora
What you should see

Keep reporting dates and units beside the answer, and inspect its original citations.

Models turning plain-English trading rules into strategy configs

See the complete models turning plain-english trading rules into strategy configs

Claude Opus 4.1 recorded 1.000 for median score in the 2025-08-11 publication. 14 models on one sample of strategy requests, this article does not state the count (the companion article of 2025-08-12 describes the same table as 12 financial questions).

Published metricValue
Median score1.000
Avg score0.945
Success rate100.0%
Avg time (ms)85,175
Input cost$15.00/M
Output cost$75.00/M

Models turning plain-English trading rules into strategy configs: read these measurements

View task, sample and measurement units

14 models on one sample of strategy requests, this article does not state the count (the companion article of 2025-08-12 describes the same table as 12 financial questions)

Convert a natural-language trading strategy request into a NexusTrade portfolio configuration of actions and conditions.

  1. Scoring

    LLM judges score each configuration from 0 to 1 using published guidelines (1.0 perfect match, 0.8 to 0.9 minor issues, 0.5 to 0.7 significant discrepancies, 0.2 to 0.4 major errors, 0.0 to 0.1 complete mismatch). Success rate is reported separately.

  2. Cost units

    The table lists each model's list price per million input and output tokens. It does not publish total run cost.

  3. Time units

    Average time per generation in milliseconds, as published in the table.

Continue exploring

Discussion

Sign in or create a free account to join the discussion.

No comments yet.

Aurora · AI research assistant

Try this in Aurora

Edit the request, then open it in Aurora. You choose when to send it.