Published model evaluations

Planning models on 29 frozen conversations

Published 2026-08-08: 16-model campaign, 29 frozen conversations; 14 model rows shown in the public table. Mean graded plan score; standard error reported separately. See the results, how they were measured and where the findings stop.

As of 2026-08-08

Published
2026-08-08
Published model rows
14
Evidence
Historical task evaluation

What this evaluation measured

GPT 5.6 Luna was the published cost-oriented selection among similar-quality planning candidates. Muse Spark 1.1 had the highest raw mean; those are different claims.

The planner chooses whether to build a plan, dispatch a tool, clarify a request or continue an existing agent. All models are replayed on the same frozen conversation corpus.

Provider-billed per-decision costs and median latency are distinct from quality scores. The highest-scoring planning models were close at the reported sample size.

Published results

meta/muse-spark-1.10.7590.079$0.02299.6s
openai/gpt-5.6-luna0.7310.068$0.00128.6s
openai/gpt-5.6-luna-pro0.7310.068$0.007621.9s
moonshotai/kimi-k30.7310.068$0.079938.9s
x-ai/grok-4.50.7240.065$0.051923.5s
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro0.7100.064$0.014227.2s
google/gemini-3.6-flash0.6620.070$0.03878.5s
anthropic/claude-opus-50.6620.074$0.315926.6s
openai/gpt-5.6-terra-pro0.6340.073$0.064616.0s
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite0.5860.066$0.00311.8s
anthropic/claude-sonnet-50.5790.071$0.134824.9s
z-ai/glm-5.20.5150.079$0.024644.8s
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash0.4930.080$0.003212.4s
qwen/qwen3.8-max0.4000.082$0.0421168.7s

16-model campaign, 29 frozen conversations; 14 model rows shown in the public table. Published 2026-08-08. Values retain their original units and grading scale.

Methodology and sample

These reviewed results come from an evaluation that has already been published. Private conversation traces are excluded. Opening this page does not run a new benchmark.

  1. Harness

    NexusTrade Router V5 plan replay

  2. Corpus

    16-model campaign, 29 frozen conversations; 14 model rows shown in the public table

  3. Metric

    Mean graded plan score; standard error reported separately

What the results do not establish

The public table omits two poolside arms for space. This snapshot contains the 14 published rows, not a reconstruction of their private outputs.

The top raw score is Muse Spark 1.1 at 0.759. GPT 5.6 Luna scored 0.731 at a reported $0.0012 per decision; the published selection favored cost among similar-quality candidates, rather than claiming the highest score.

The source reports a paired comparison with Opus as inconclusive. This page does not turn small raw gaps into a confident quality winner.

Read the original evidence

Continue exploring