Explore more topics
Published model evaluations

GPT-4.1 Nano: trading task evaluations

See how openai/gpt-4.1-nano performed in 1 trading task evaluation, with exact version, measured results, dates and test inputs.

As of 2025-04-15

Jump to a section

TL;DR

GPT-4.1 Nano (openai/gpt-4.1-nano) appears in 1 published study. 2025-04-15, Models generating SQL for financial questions, April 2025: 0.382 for average score. Each result belongs to its own task, date and grading method.

Exact tested ID
openai/gpt-4.1-nano
Published studies
1
Provider
openai

Inspect this exact model

Step 1 of 3

Models generating SQL for financial questions, April 2025

GPT-4.1 Nano: source evidence dated 2025-04-15.

Average score
0.382
Median score
0.050
Std dev
0.454
Success rate
53.3%
Avg execution
38,614 ms
Input cost
$0.10/M
What you should see

The displayed values belong to the identified model versions and this published task, with their original metric units.

Step 2 of 3

How did this version perform on the job I need?

The first measured row below belongs to this model, not its provider's other models. Open that study to see the other arms and tested input.

2025-04-15: Models generating SQL for financial questions, April 2025
What you should see

Select a model for the specific tested task. A profile with one study does not establish performance on other jobs.

Step 3 of 3

Test a strategy with Aurora

Select a model for the specific tested task. A profile with one study does not establish performance on other jobs.

Test a strategy with Aurora
What you should see

Keep reporting dates and units beside the answer, and inspect its original citations.

Models generating SQL for financial questions, April 2025

See the complete models generating sql for financial questions, april 2025

GPT-4.1 Nano recorded 0.382 for average score in the 2025-04-15 publication. 60 financial questions per the article text, 11 models.

Published metricValue
Average score0.382
Median score0.050
Std dev0.454
Success rate53.3%
Avg execution38,614 ms
Input cost$0.10/M
Output cost$0.40/M

Models generating SQL for financial questions, April 2025: read these measurements

View task, sample and measurement units

60 financial questions per the article text, 11 models

Generate SQL queries that correctly answer financial analysis questions.

  1. Scoring

    The article reports scores and success rates but refers readers to an earlier article for the methodology. The grader is not described in this article.

  2. Cost units

    List prices per million tokens, from $0.10/M input for GPT-4.1 Nano and Gemini 2.0 Flash to $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Grok-3-Beta. No measured run spend is published.

  3. Time units

    Average execution time in milliseconds, from 1,296 ms (Gemini 2.0 Flash) to 38,614 ms (GPT-4.1 Nano).

Continue exploring

Discussion

Sign in or create a free account to join the discussion.

No comments yet.

Aurora · AI research assistant

Try this in Aurora

Edit the request, then open it in Aurora. You choose when to send it.